Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "TJ admissions results out?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hannah Natanson needs to start reading DCUM[/quote] +1 She is a very shallow reporter. To simply parrot the 33% low income figure - which is entirely unbelievable - without any mention of the fact that the question for that highly likely resulted in many non-low income kids replying yes to it - is the best example. [/quote] Is anyone actually going to offer any evidence to support this claim?[/quote] In the absence of any response from FCPS it has been established that the low-income claim is based on suspect FARMS data. It takes a few minutes for FCPS and their publicity department to issue a clarification. They have not. Because doing so will jeopardize their claim that “reform” has helped bring in more lower- income kids. [b] So the onus is on FCPS to issue a clarification. All we get is TJAAG stooges on this Forum parroting party points. But no data and no formal clarification. [/quote] FCPS has no responsibility to respond to a claim that has no basis in fact and has not been offered on any legitimate platform. Get someone with any credentials to report on it and maybe you'll get a response, but until then, you're a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist. The people pushing the Curie story at least had evidence that they were pointing to - actual stories from real TJ students who were named in the report.[/quote] And you derive your legitimacy on an anonymous board because … FCPS can speak for itself especially when enough people have requested the information. And they will have to disclose when the case is up for hearing. You and your fellow TJAAG minions can rest. Or else identify yourself if you have any credibility. What a pompous fool[/quote] [b]The only advantage I have over you in terms of legitimacy is that I know what I'm talking about. [/b] But that advantage is irrelevant to this conversation because I'm not asking for FCPS to respond to a wild-ass claim that I'm making that has no basis in fact. [/quote] The definition of a pompous fool. You don’t identify yourself, indulge in ideological hyperbole devoid of any factual corroboration for your position and tell us that you know more than us. You are a troll - likely on the TJAAG payroll. The Russians will pay you better[/quote] You're gonna wear out the binding on that thesaurus there, friendo. But I get responses all the time that confirm that I know what I'm talking about. No one on these pages identifies themselves. But the information that I put out on a regular basis actually helps people. And they express appreciation for it every day on these threads. My guess is that you've helped no one and attacked hundreds. And no, I'm not on the TJAAG payroll. Do they even have a payroll? But I am an alum, and that informs a lot of my knowledge and understanding. I've done the hard work that you haven't.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics