Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]IANAL but the premise that a policy that has been ruled neutral should not be subject to inquiry about intent seems a bit creepy. By analogy, suppose it was a trial about someone who had fired a gun. If a gun was used against someone, it could have been used as a weapon of defense or a weapon of aggression. Use is therefore not inherently a crime. Obviously the purpose would be a major factor in determining whether a crime occurred. I don't see how this is any different from the admissions trial.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
