Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here's a novel thought for conservatives:

If you don't believe in abortions, DON'T HAVE ONE.

Leave everyone else alone.  Leave them their FREEDOM and LIBERTY you claim to support.  Their business is none of your business.[/quote]

Except when Dems force medical treatments on our bodies right?  Because really it's DEMS right to chose what women must do to their bodies.

[b]Forced injections = okay[/b]

No abortion available = not okay.

Is that how your freedom in bodies works?

Would GOP forcing Deprovera shots on women be cool too?  It would prevent all those maternal hemorrhaging deaths.  And obviously unwanted pregnancies[/quote]

I challenge you to show me any place which is forcibly injecting people.  Yes, there are “vaccine mandates” for people in certain lines of work which are either high risk to self or high exposure to others.  Yes, you may be required to show that you have been vaccinated or recently tested to participate in some voluntary things like restaurants, cinema, etc.  BUT, no one is forced to be vaccinated.  If you don’t want to be vaccinated, you are free to refuse, as some 30-40% of the country continues to do.

P.s. You obviously don’t understand the pro-life at conception position, which would ultimately ban Depoprovera as an abortifacient medication.

These kinds of inapt analogies show how weak the position on abortion prohibition is.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics