Reply to RBG Politcal Discussion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "RBG Politcal Discussion"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The president has an obligation to send a nomination to the Senate.  He will likely take a few weeks to do interviews and vetting and nominate the best woman for the job.

The Senate may not be able to conduct hearings as a practical matter until the lame duck session.  It takes time to review documents and interview people.  A number of Republican senators also have committed to not vote for a S.Ct. nominee before the election, and they will be true to their words.  So, we'll probably see a vote in December.  There is no guarantee that Trump's nominee would sail through and he realistically would only have one opportunity assuming Biden is elected.

I just hope the next nominee for the Supreme Court, whoever she is, and regardless of who nominates her, is not subject to the politics of personal destruction.  In this town, ruining people is considered sport.   [/quote]

Nope.  Bunch of power mad hypocritical liars.  There is zero justification for doing this after Garland.  Can't have different rules.  [/quote]

There is only one rule--politicians will act in their self interest.  Biden would have done the exact same thing in 1992 as McConnell did in 2016.  Get over it.[/quote]

You know how Republicans like to say that Russia doesn't actually prefer Trump, they just want to sow discord. Here is Mitch's chance to prevent discord. Will he do it? Or will he do Russia's bidding? Will he make our country stronger or weaker?

I actually don't care who is appointed. I'm independent. It makes no difference to me. It's the fight that terrifies me. I can't get over it because I have to live in the U.S. Do you?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics