Reply to Barr and Durham

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr and Durham"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just because Brennan isn't a target, does that mean nobody did anything wrong? (Fyi, someone has already pled guilty who was associated with the investigation). So Durham's investigation is entirely political and shut down because those who have been interviewed say so?

Seriously, the Muller investigation was allowed to proceed and lots of hearings were held to go over it with a fine tooth comb. Heck, democrats are still investigating Russia by seeking grand jury materials. Let's get the same from Durham's investigation.

Goose Gander Rule folks. [/quote]

Just because Brennan's spokesperson says he is not a target, that doesn't mean he isn't a target.  
Durham will not comment on statements like this.  Brennan knows that.  He's looking for positive media before the hammer falls.  [/quote]

There is absolutely no chance that some of Brennan's background would put a statement out claiming he isn't a target, if, in fact, he is a target. Just because Trump does things like that doesn't mean everyone behaves that way. Think back to 2016, would this type of behavior have been tolerated by our political class then? Ridiculous what people have come to expect now.[/quote]

That’s ridiculous. Of course someone with his background would. [/quote]
DP.  What would be the point?  Someone in his position would know that a statement like this won’t chance Durham’s investigation, and it would just look worse later when it came out that Brennan lied about not being a target or subject.  There’s no value in lying about this when he could have just stayed silent.[/quote]
The point would be to lay out the narrative that he is innocent and this is political. [/quote]

He can do that either way.  But if it comes out that he lied about being told he wasn’t a target or subject, that would undermine his narrative.  He would be better off saying nothing unless it’s true that Durham told him this.[/quote]

Oh, come on.  When we discover that he is actually a target, the media would NEVER believe that Brennan lied about it.  The media will cover for him.  
It will be another opportunity for Brennan, et al, to question the Durham probe.  This is such a predictable move by Brennan.  
After 8 hours of interrogation, there is no way he is not going to issue a statement.  And, any statement he issues is going to paint himself in a positive light.  [/quote]
It would actually become apparent pretty quickly whether it was Brennan or Durham who lied about this, because if Durham lied to Brennan about not being a subject or target in order to induce him to cooperate with the interview, Brennan’s team will move to exclude all evidence that came from or was derived from that interview.  No such motion would must likely mean that Brennan lied.

Also, if Brennan has been told he was a target (and that has to be disclosed), he likely would not have agreed to be interviewed, and definitely not for 8 hours.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics