Reply to Playing time expectations

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Playing time expectations "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I fixed it for you.

To the OP, look at the tone of the complainers. If a kid is getting more time they are labeled as "favorites" and not considered to be better. Sure parents were unhappy and I'll give them credit for talking to the coach. But all they wanted was unilaterally more playing time without a consideration of how their kids could actually improve to earn more minutes. But they've covered the fruitlessness of that endeavor because in their eyes the other kids are "favorites" and not actually deserving or better players in a travel environment.

Similar things have been echoed by other "take my ball and go home" parents who have used words or statements like "believe" or the coach just isn't "interested in my kid".

The bottom line is that in order for a kid to actually get better and become a better player they have to admit that they actually need to get better. Simply leaving a club for greener pastures will not in and of itself make the player better in the long run.

Where this whole thread is really divided is there are two lines:

I am advocating that the real issue is how to help the kid get better as a player. I have made no statements about staying or leaving the current team. To me that is secondary and one should always go where they are happy, appreciated etc...

The other side is really only interested in the minutes and not really about the development. Not one of the opposing statements have mentioned anything about how their kid can improve. They believe playing time and development are one and the same. The coach is right about training being more important than games. Games are fun but they are not the development tool you believe them to be. The desire to play is strong and a kid should play where they can be impactful but that is not as important at 9 years old. Practicing with and against stronger players 3 times a week is more important than 5 more minutes in a game.

______________________________________________/

Start with explaining how the kid is getting better sitting on the bench?  Remember we are talking about kids who show up to every practice with good attitudes and work hard.  Are they learning better passing skills sitting on the bench?  Are they learning spacing?  Are they getting better with their dribbling in game conditions sitting on the bench?  What, exactly, are they getting better at by sitting on the bench?  And, if they are, in fact, getting "better" shouldn't the kids on the field also be getting "better" in the same manner?  Why are those kids being penalized by playing the games?  Why is it so important that player A sit on the bench for half or more of a game, but player B plays most of the game?  Is player A benefiting from sitting on the bench more than player is benefiting from playing in the game?  Really -- with your theory -- player B should just sit and watch the entire game, because he will then improve more.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics