Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Sign of Republicans Lawmakers Turning on Trump"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The bottom line is that it's neither illegal, nor an impeachable offense, for a politician--including the President--to use his or her position to seek political favors. It's standard operating procedure and all the swamp creatures in Washington do it, constantly. That's part of "politics."[/quote] Asking genuinely to Trump supporters: why do you think this? Can you think of another example where a president has asked a foreign power for help in an election? The irony is that by refusing to punish his behavior, you are ensuring that from now on, we will in fact get the swamp that you think we already have.[/quote] Nixon did it. [url]https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/08/06/nixon-vietnam-candidate-conspired-with-foreign-power-win-election-215461[/url][/quote] Um. Nixon did it is not a great defense.[/quote] How about Clinton? https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2019/10/08/tucker-carlson-uncovers-electionyear-request-from-bill-clinton-to-tony-blair-n2554331[/quote] Is there any evidence other than from Tucker Carlson, who isn't exactly a non biased real journalist. Senate R lead Intelligence Committee just came out with a report stating that Russians interfered in our elections in support of Trump. Have they found any proof that any other government had this much affect on our elections in support of a Dem? https://www.npr.org/2019/10/08/768319934/senate-report-russians-used-used-social-media-mostly-to-target-race-in-2016[/quote] Just because Tucker Carlson found the evidence does not mean it is biased. If you look at the article you will see it is the official transcript of the call. It is pretty clear[/quote] Really? So if CNN or WaPo or NYT uncovers evidence, does that mean it it is not necessarily biased? Ha... tell that to Trump and Trumpsters. But your "unbiased" evidence by Tucker Carlson has a few holes in it... like the timeline. LOL[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics