Reply to well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He’d been investigated six times before, or did you miss that little nugget?[/quote]
This is like communicating with an eight year old. It’s been pointed out on this thread that he had background investigations. How these work is that you, the one being investigated, provides an address where you’ve lived for the last x years and the name of a person you were acquainted with at that address. So for most of these, his time in high schoo, wouldn’t even have come up and if he didn’t supply Christine Blasey Ford’s name - and why would you give the name of someone you sexually assaulted? - it wouldn’t come up. The background investigator comes and asks your friends or family or whoever you listed a set series of questions, the end. Some branches require polygraphs, but he was appointed to many of the positions that necessitated the background and those aren’t usually poly’d. It’s not a thorough investigation meant to turn up everything in your life.

And AGAIN: the WH severely limited the scope and duration of the investigation of the CBF incident. It was not investigated,[/quote]

DP
And, as has been pointed out numerous times here,...............
How in the hell do you expect the FBI to conduct an investigation of an incident that one person claimed happened, but the people SHE said were present have no knowledge of it?  An incident in which the "complainant" cannot give the day, the date, or even the year in which the alleged incident happened?  An incident in which the "complainant" cannot give the location at which the incident happened?   An incident that nobody else can corroborate?

Nah, y'all didn't want an investigation.  That was all a delay tactic.  You were hoping and praying for a delay long enough - just long enough - that a new nominee would need to be named and vetted in HOPES that you would win the Senate and block any confirmation.  We are not stupid.  [/quote]
Squi can corroborate it. CBF said Bretty’s best friend was in the room. That they were laughing.

And you investigate it the same way you investigate lots of old crimes. The FBI does this already, you know.

It’s bizarre, absolutely bizarre the level of hypocrisy conservatives have. I mean I’m beginning to suspect you all have some shared brain anomaly that enables this level of self delusion in regards to your motivations. This is the highest court on the land and the people appointed tonit are supposed to be beyond reproach, just nearly perfect people. [b]But this guy - alcoholic, owned by some mysterious benefactor, a hypocrite himself (you can’t poke your nose in someone’s sexual activities and then get bent out of shape when it bends around to you) and the alleged aggressor in several reported sexual assaults. [/b]That’s not beyond reproach. That’s wildly inappropriate. [/quote]

I'm reading this drivel with astonishment, especially the bolded.  Where are you getting that he's an "alcoholic"??  "Owned by a mysterious benefactor"??  He paid for baseball tickets on his credit card and was then paid back by the friends he bought them for.  Have you never done that?  I have - recently, for a concert.  My CC was HUGE until I received money from everyone whose tickets I bought.  Really, this is not some mystery.

As for "poking his nose in someone's sexual activities" - it was already public knowledge that Clinton had been sexually involved with Lewinsky.  Nothing to hide there.  Kavanaugh flatly denies any incident with Ford *ever* took place, so there are no "sexual activities" to poke around in.  And certainly, no evidence to support that the incident in question ever occurred.  As for the "several reported sexual assaults" - what would those be, exactly?  Are you seriously using Julie Swetnick as a credible source??  Even in her fevered imagination she never came out and accused Kavanaugh of assaulting anyone.  She simply lied about him being at a party, and then tried to walk it all back when she was called on it.  So exactly, what are these "several" other reports you refer to?

It's clear you are simply completely bent out of shape yourself because he was confirmed - after a lifetime of service - as he should have been.  You can't stand it because he's conservative.  It's really that simple.  Talk about wildly inappropriate.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics