Reply to well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He’d been investigated six times before, or did you miss that little nugget?[/quote]
This is like communicating with an eight year old. It’s been pointed out on this thread that he had background investigations. How these work is that you, the one being investigated, provides an address where you’ve lived for the last x years and the name of a person you were acquainted with at that address. So for most of these, his time in high schoo, wouldn’t even have come up and if he didn’t supply Christine Blasey Ford’s name - and why would you give the name of someone you sexually assaulted? - it wouldn’t come up. The background investigator comes and asks your friends or family or whoever you listed a set series of questions, the end. Some branches require polygraphs, but he was appointed to many of the positions that necessitated the background and those aren’t usually poly’d. It’s not a thorough investigation meant to turn up everything in your life.

And AGAIN: the WH severely limited the scope and duration of the investigation of the CBF incident. It was not investigated,[/quote]

DP
And, as has been pointed out numerous times here,...............
How in the hell do you expect the FBI to conduct an investigation of an incident that one person claimed happened, but the people SHE said were present have no knowledge of it?  An incident in which the "complainant" cannot give the day, the date, or even the year in which the alleged incident happened?  An incident in which the "complainant" cannot give the location at which the incident happened?   An incident that nobody else can corroborate?

Nah, y'all didn't want an investigation.  That was all a delay tactic.  You were hoping and praying for a delay long enough - just long enough - that a new nominee would need to be named and vetted in HOPES that you would win the Senate and block any confirmation.  We are not stupid.  [/quote]
Squi can corroborate it. CBF said Bretty’s best friend was in the room. That they were laughing.

And you investigate it the same way you investigate lots of old crimes. The FBI does this already, you know.

It’s bizarre, absolutely bizarre the level of hypocrisy conservatives have. I mean I’m beginning to suspect you all have some shared brain anomaly that enables this level of self delusion in regards to your motivations. This is the highest court on the land and the people appointed tonit are supposed to be beyond reproach, just nearly perfect people. But this guy - alcoholic, owned by some mysterious benefactor, a hypocrite himself (you can’t poke your nose in someone’s sexual activities and then get bent out of shape when it bends around to you) and the alleged aggressor in several reported sexual assaults. That’s not beyond reproach. That’s wildly inappropriate. [/quote]

OMG. 
CBF said lots of things.  Lots of things that had no evidence.  
What is bizarre is that you think the FBI would be able to find more evidence about an alleged incident for which there were no details.  Total insanity. 
And FFS - if Kavanaugh were an alcoholic, that WOULD have shown up on a background check.  You are accusing him of all kinds of things - none of which are true.  
What is bizarre is that YOU believe all the crap the left wing media threw out and hoped would stick - and evidently, some very gullible people like you fell for it.  That is bizarre.  [/quote]
No, alcoholism would not have shown up on a background check unless he had a polygraph. As I said above, as his positions requiring background checks were appointments, it’s unlikely that he was poly’d. By his own admission he was a drunk in high school (though he calls it “partying”) and seems to have continued that through high school. What is bizarre is that you swallows any idiotic lie you were fed. Like believing his debt was baseball tickets.

And he is just thumbing his short nose at us all with the optics of this clerkship. He’s a dud.[/quote]

I don't know if he was a alcoholic or not - certainly appears that drinking to excess was a part of his life at one point - but it's a joke if you think those background investigations would really uncover something that he wants hidden. People hide undesirable behavior. Their friends don't rat them out.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics