Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "The St James acquires FCV"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Those aren't excuses.....that's reality. Until last year, Loudoun had no place for their top girls to compete at the highest levels after U12, so many left for programs that did. Not a slight on Loudoun - just a fact. In a few years, if you compare the 07s, 08s, 09s, 10s, etc. across the area and all of those teams are struggling, then you can draw your own conclusion. But until that point, you're just comparing apples to oranges.[/quote] I would say 06 and up. Most of these girls will stay now with Loudoun. I know for fact girls that played Loudoun, eventually left to go McLean because of ECNL. Not going to happen any longer. Of course, there might be one or two here in there. This will keep Loudoun more competitive. Time will show this. So any naysayers can eat a big fat one... [/quote] If Loudoun was so good as developing, driving far away isn't desirable and the GDA is so restrictive, they never should have left in the first place for FCV or McLean or anywhere else. Fact is that Loudoun is NOT doing a good job across the board at developing and players that want more, leave. That will continue even if less go to FCV. Loudoun wants to keep players and attract players from far away like McLean supposedly did, they would simply do a better job at developing. Kickball trophies at U-little ages mean nothing in the long run. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics