Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Fleeing APS schools for FFX County"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Since you've been here since 2000, I assume you remember the Yorktown controversy?[/quote] I believe that you are vastly overstating the "controversy". I am not sure why you are so intent on defending the school board. But want to do so, you are going to need more than your opinion as none of your "facts and stuff" have held up very well so far.[/quote] You haven't posted anything inconsistent with what I said. My whole point on the bond thing was that rather than upset voters by pushing for more aggressive growth (which even they theselves couldn't be sure they needed at that point, given the trends), the school board did smaller projects that required smaller bonds that were more likely to be acceptable to voters. That voters approved those bonds is fully consistent with that account. As for the Yorktown, here are just a few links to articles and letters during that time around the debate, there are many more out there as well: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/group-backs-33-million-school-bond-package?_amp=true http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/10/AR2006071001287.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/07/AR2006060700702.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/25/AR2006102500469.html This article is from 2004, but it details how overenrollment at the high school level was projected to be resolved by the high school expansions; if you look at what actually happened later, it didnt resolve overenrollment at all because the actual growth rate was much higher than anticipated: http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/news/2004/may/11/school-construction-to-cost-229-million/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics