Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Did the Takoma MS magnet got MORE white this year?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] If you think one or two "enriched" classes is the same as a whole magnet program, then you are clueless about how a magnet program works. If MCPS brought the exact same program to the western side, then I would agree with you. But they aren't doing that.[/quote] I think that two special classes is only one class less than the number of magnet classes in the magnet program.[/quote] Those two "special" classes are not going to be the same as the magnet programs, and even if it's one less, it's still not the same. [/quote] My God. I'm inclined to be sympathetic to disappointed parents, but this is just foot stamping nonsense at this point. This whole thread is a case study in hoarding opportunity and deep resentment at the idea that [b]someone else might get a chance to reach their potential.[/b] [/quote] .. at the expense of others based on where they live. It's not about "hoarding". It's about equitable access, which this new method does not provide in the case of "peer cohort". If they did away with the cohort nonsense, the whole thread would go away.[/quote] If they did away with cohort, there would still be kids who didn't get in, so I don't think we'd be better off in terms of complaining. But they've ALWAYS considered peer cohort because they have always had to figure out how to best distribute limited seats. Allowing kids with strong peer cohorts to remain in their home schools, while providing opportunities to kids who don't have the same advantage in terms of peer cohort, is and always has been the best way to distribute a scarce resource. It maximizes benefit. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics