Reply to Kushner, Manafort and Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the campaign

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Kushner, Manafort and Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the campaign"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just so I'm clear- the outrage here is that Trump's son met with a Russian lawyer with "government ties" who claimed to have dirt on Hillary?[/quote]

Yes. Because that is a crime (aka colluding with a hostile foreign government to influence an election).  What, you think NBD?  It's a HUGE deal. It also stops the "months of investigation and no collusion shown" narrative of Trumpkins. Collusion not just shown-- admitted in writing. Game. Set. Match. [/quote]

PP you responded to and not a Trump supporter, but the ethics double standard here and what people will forgive their own candidate of choice for vs the opponent is quite rich.

A Russian lawyer with "ties" to the Russian gov soliciting Trump's son for a meeting with dirt on Hillary hardly seems like a smoking gun for the campaign [b]systemically [/b]colluding with the Russian gov.[/quote]

thanks for the qualifier, the bar keeps getting higher and higher, eh.

1. No evidence, its all smoke
2. Well no evidence of collusion, its just alleged obstruction of justice
3.  no HARD evidence. In public.
4. Its not hard evidence of SYSTEMATIC collusion.

Is circumstantial evidence of systematic collusion enough for you?  If this was the first time they had heard about Russia helping them, why didn't they react with more surprise? [/quote]

Happy to be corrected as I don't have any skin in this game, but it's evidence of a single private citizen with tenuous ties to the Russian gov soliciting a meeting and not circumstantial evidence of systemic collaboration. The desired narrative that the Russian gov won the election for Trump (otherwise it would've went to Hillary) has defined media coverage non-stop since November like it's Watergate 2.0. Facts and hard evidence should be defining the stories and narrative and right now it's just the opposite, a fishing expedition for page views. Comey hearings were a complete blowout (and if anything made the media look worse than before) and this is the closest they've gotten, so I won't froth at the mouth like some of you just yet.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics