Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Indeed, brave girls were asked to players in completely different positions, McLean players kept same positions as usual. Coincidence? [/quote]

We experienced this last year. This is something CW will often ask players to do at ID sessions. I don’t think it was a set up — some of the union players were also asked to do so. The ones with offers already in hand did play their normal positions.

This is done to look for intuitive understanding of other roles on field. Common to see this asked particularly for players where there is an interest in order to understand their capacity. Not a set up for failure but method for a deeper look. [/quote]

A player that is versatile and can play different positions is more valuable.  My teens have played every position on the field and have no problem if coach needs to fill them in somewhere else.[/quote]

Perfectly fine on a practice set up and a later ages. Here after a merge, players were there to show their best not otherwise. Really, some people here have no clue or have never played the sport. [/quote]

Well if they have 10 strikers but your kid can play that and outside mid or center back very well too—guess who gets picked.  It’s the same in college, btw. I know “forwards” who now play defense in college.[/quote]uncomfortable truth… most forwards and wingers end up on defense in college…  once u let go of position hype and focus in growth and technical skills the college thing becomes way more clear.  Not all kids are game changers offensively . Collegr coaches pick based off needs.[/quote]

😂[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics