Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Blake said in her deposition that she said he could come in. Contradicting the other two women. [/quote] No. Blake concurred with the other women that when Heath knocked on the door, all three of them told him not to come in, and that he came in anyway. The makeup artist testified that after he came in, there was a conversation between Lively and Heath in which Heath insisted on staying and Lively eventually gave in, but that she (the MUA) did not remember the exact details of this conversation because she and the other MUA were focused on trying to get the work on Lively done quickly and doing their best to try and cover her up (though all that was available was a small towel on the counter that they used for clean up -- Lively's costume had been handed out the door to wardrobe when she came in). Lively testified to the details of the conversation that the MUA was not focused on. She said that Heath had insisted the conversation happen at that time due to Lively's turnaround time (the union-dictated amount of time Lively needed to be off set between shooting days). Lively says she relented, but on the condition that Heath agreed to turn away from her during the conversation. Lively, the MUA, and Heath all testified that Heath later was looking directly at Lively. There are no contradictions in the accounts between Lively and the MUA. Heath claims that the women said "come in" when he knocked, but all the women testified that they said "no, no, no" and not to come in. Lively and the MUA testified that after the incident, they took to locking the door to the make up trailer if anyone was in a state of undress, whenever possible. The MUA testified that the incident was upsetting and very unusual, and that the habit of locking the trailer door was initiated by the make up team due to what felt like a serious violation.[/quote] Lively also testified that Heath “wasn’t trying to cop a look” so none of what you wrote above matters, although I’m sure most of what you wrote is entirely inaccurate, it always is.[/quote] Exactly. The accounts are all over the place but the one that matters is Blake’s because she’s the one who is claiming SH. SH has to be subjectively offensive so the fact that Blake in her deposition said she told him he could come in and the fact that she later said I know you weren’t trying to cop a look both undermine this claim as SH. Blake is not a child. If she was going to let Heath in, she could’ve put on a robe or said call me. So many other options. But in her deposition she said he said we need to chat before the other meeting or we have to postpone it and she said fine come in b/c she didn’t want to postpone. Blake has to take some accountability.[/quote] What matters more is whether she is telling a consistent story and what that story is. This was a nothing burger in her original complaint that she is now trying to use because all of her other allegations have fallen apart.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics