Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]\You know less than you think you do.[/quote]

I agree and it goes both ways. Even I (generally considered pro-Lively for this forum) kind of believed Heath about the walking into her dressing room thing being more of a nothingburger where she was breastfeeding but basically covered and he briefly turned around to look at her, and I was surprised how bad it was in Baker and Carrol's description. Their depos revealed for the first time that there was a chorus of voices telling him not to enter, that she was topless and wearing just a thong while breastfeeding (with one breast uncovered), and that her body was fully visible to him in the mirror the whole time. If you are going into the unsealing looking only for things that make Lively look bad you'll find them, but there was lots that made Wayfarer look bad too. [/quote]

Have you not seen other depositions of disputing this? The narrative of what happened here is totally all over the place and there is no consensus. I get Ange and Alex confused but one of them said that it was a planned meeting - Blake invited Heath invited him to her trailer - he came in but she told him not to look. that undermines the makeup artist who said he knocked and they were screaming don’t come in don’t come in and he came in. Which doesn’t sound right anyway cause why would he knock if he was just going to burst in?

The whole thing is really stupid.

[/quote]

Yes, I read all of them. Saks and Gianetti weren't there so they couldn't really dispute exactly what happened. It may be true that Lively and Heath arranged to meet at her trailer, but that's where she gets dressed so obviously if you knock on the door and they say not to come in, you use common sense and wait. There was a time crunch because Lively's contract mandates her hours, so Heath pressured her and she agreed to let him stay if he wouldn't look, then (she claims) she realized he had been looking at her in the mirror. Heath claims he knocked and they told him to come in, but the other three people who were actually there (Lively, Carrol, and Baker) say they didn't say that, and specifically told him not to come in (although Lively agreed he could stay after he entered). To me, that means Heath is the one that is lying, but maybe the jury will see it otherwise or find it doesn't matter. That's why it's still an open issue (and in my opinion, one that looks bad for Wayfarer). [/quote]

I guess it depends on which narrative wins out. Heath could easily say he thought don’t come in was come in though. I mean it is possible he misheard?

I imagine it would be helpful if we could see a calendar or something or any exchanges about who set the meeting and if Blake was in fact, expecting him. I haven’t seen anything either way disputing or confirming that.

Early on, when Justin launched his website, the narrative was that Blake regularly summoned both Baldoni and Heath do her trailer. This would match because there’s also deposition that shows Blake ask Jamey Heath, the CEO, to bring her toilet paper at one point, so it does seem like she had a habit of inviting folks into her trailer. Reddit went crazy with this detail.

I’m not saying she did this at this time, it could have been different but that’s why I had it in my head cause she regularly invited them to her trailer because she was BFing etc and it was easier for her. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics