Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]\You know less than you think you do.[/quote] I agree and it goes both ways. Even I (generally considered pro-Lively for this forum) kind of believed Heath about the walking into her dressing room thing being more of a nothingburger where she was breastfeeding but basically covered and he briefly turned around to look at her, and I was surprised how bad it was in Baker and Carrol's description. Their depos revealed for the first time that there was a chorus of voices telling him not to enter, that she was topless and wearing just a thong while breastfeeding (with one breast uncovered), and that her body was fully visible to him in the mirror the whole time. If you are going into the unsealing looking only for things that make Lively look bad you'll find them, but there was lots that made Wayfarer look bad too. [/quote] Have you not seen other depositions of disputing this? The narrative of what happened here is totally all over the place and there is no consensus. I get Ange and Alex confused but one of them said that it was a planned meeting - Blake invited Heath invited him to her trailer - he came in but she told him not to look. that undermines the makeup artist who said he knocked and they were screaming don’t come in don’t come in and he came in. Which doesn’t sound right anyway cause why would he knock if he was just going to burst in? The whole thing is really stupid. [/quote] Yes, I read all of them. Saks and Gianetti weren't there so they couldn't really dispute exactly what happened. It may be true that Lively and Heath arranged to meet at her trailer, but that's where she gets dressed so obviously if you knock on the door and they say not to come in, you use common sense and wait. There was a time crunch because Lively's contract mandates her hours, so Heath pressured her and she agreed to let him stay if he wouldn't look, then (she claims) she realized he had been looking at her in the mirror. Heath claims he knocked and they told him to come in, but the other three people who were actually there (Lively, Carrol, and Baker) say they didn't say that, and specifically told him not to come in (although Lively agreed he could stay after he entered). To me, that means Heath is the one that is lying, but maybe the jury will see it otherwise or find it doesn't matter. That's why it's still an open issue (and in my opinion, one that looks bad for Wayfarer). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics