Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]\You know less than you think you do.[/quote]

I agree and it goes both ways. Even I (generally considered pro-Lively for this forum) kind of believed Heath about the walking into her dressing room thing being more of a nothingburger where she was breastfeeding but basically covered and he briefly turned around to look at her, and I was surprised how bad it was in Baker and Carrol's description. Their depos revealed for the first time that there was a chorus of voices telling him not to enter, that she was topless and wearing just a thong while breastfeeding (with one breast uncovered), and that her body was fully visible to him in the mirror the whole time. If you are going into the unsealing looking only for things that make Lively look bad you'll find them, but there was lots that made Wayfarer look bad too. [/quote]

Have you not seen other depositions of disputing this? The narrative of what happened here is totally all over the place and there is no consensus. I get Ange and Alex confused but one of them said that it was a planned meeting - Blake invited Heath invited him to her trailer - he came in but she told him not to look. that undermines the makeup artist who said he knocked and they were screaming don’t come in don’t come in and he came in. Which doesn’t sound right anyway cause why would he knock if he was just going to burst in?

The whole thing is really stupid.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics