Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I think people don't realize how much of the key depositions are still under seal. Huge portions of Heath's, Baldoni's, and Lively's depos still under seal, including most of the discussion of the birthing scene. We don't have Baldoni's or Lively's account of the January 17th meeting, only Heath and Ange Giannetti (and their accounts conflict directly, especially on the reading of the 17 point list and how it was phrase and what issues were covered).

What we do have really makes it a toss up. A lot of Heath's deposition is problematic in that he admits to knowing about most of Lively's complaints dating back to May of 2023, and also appears to understand that these complaints should have been referred to HR but were not.

The conflicts between Heath's depo and Alex Sach's depo are very problematic. Alex alleges that Heath not only knew there were allegations from multiple women but that he expressly declined to open an HR investigation even after she used it because he didn't want it written down. Heath denies that but it's just her word against his.

Meanwhile, on the retaliation, Melissa Nathan was caught in multiple lies in her deposition, and had to backtrack when emails with Katie case were produced showing she lied. This is more relevant to the Jonesworks v. Abel case but could absolutely become relevant in Lively's case.

It's possible the judge is going to dismiss it all due to Blake being an independent contractor or say CA law doesn't apply which would remove several claims. However, I think based on the last hearing that even if he does this, he will allow the contract claims to proceed. This is still very problematic for Wayfarer because I do think Blake will pursue the contract claims to trial even if it's all she has left, which would still pull in all the stuff with the birth scene (violation of nudity rider), changes to script to add intimacy (violation of work agreement and Lively's approval of shooting script without those changes), and all the retaliation claims (because Wayfarer signed the 17 point list which included a promise not to retaliate against Lively for any of this). It doesn't go away, even if they get rid of the SH claims.

I think those of you who think all the evidence is out (it's definitely not) or that Lively has already lost (she hasn't) are going to once again be frustrated and disappointed when it doesn't go the way your echo chamber keeps claiming it's going to go. Remember when everyone was shocked that the Wayfarer complaint got dismissed even though many of us were pointing out the serious defects and evidentiary weaknesses for months beforehand? Or how you were all convinced they'd refile? Or appeal?

Go ahead and yell at me for my long post or tell me "all that has been debunked" (it hasn't). I'm actually trying to help y'all understand that the story you are being sold about this case is simply untrue. You know less than you think you do.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics