Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Everyone across the board is happy with scenario 4 except a small contingent of folks from NE Vienna, Wolf Trap Elementary, and Lemon Rd elementary.[/quote] Wrong - Wolftrap elementary families by far favor scenario 4[/quote] That was certainly my impression. [/quote] For parents with kids currently at Wolftrap attending the meeting than yes but for parents with kids attending or having attended Marshall with Wolftrap as their elementary school than no. The second group would much rather stay with the Wolfrap / Kilmer / Marshall boundary.[/quote] We were talking about the comments at the Madison/McLean meeting last night. [b]There were a lot of Wolftrap parents saying they favored the elimination of the split feeder, which sends them all to Madison.[/b] There was one parent asking whether his kid could attend Marshall if they are rezoned to Madison. I don't doubt there are other Wolftrap families happy with Marshall, but they weren't speaking up last night to leave the boundary unchanged. [/quote] They can join Lemon Road’s pouting party who were told in Scenarios 1-3 that their split feeder would be resolved. Keeping Wolftrap at Marshall resolves the attendance island at the MS and HS level, and while Madison might have some capacity, Thoreau would be at 107% with nearly 750 students per grade. [/quote] They could still decide to reassign the Westbriar island to either Colvin Run or Sunrise Valley. Moving all of Wolftrap to Madison turned that island, which previously had just been an ES island, into an ES/MS/HS island. It's one thing to leave a current island alone. It's another thing to create a new island, or make an existing island worse by turning it into an island for not just the ES, but also the MS and/or HS. [/quote] i think sunrise valley is a high probability if the chunk of south lakes in one of those proposals goes to KAA. south lakes will go down to 80%. it makes sense to move them there [/quote] Or send the island to Colvin Run/Cooper/Langley and they won't have to wait until 2030 to have the capacity-based argument to move at least part of Forestville into the Herndon pyramid. Either eliminates the Westbriar island. [/quote] i don’t see them doing that this round. i have listened to many meetings and reid has said from here it will be micro changes and they aren’t going to propose moving any areas that haven’t been considered already. they said they are too far in and can’t handle the fight if it happens. if they move westbriar to langley it would put it over capacity which is the main focus of this round of boundary changes (per reid). they would then have to cut neighborhoods out of langley which have not been proposed in any scenario so far. i dont see it happening [/quote] At the WSHS meeting, she said that at the beginning, but by the end of the night after hearing all the complaints by the 2 neighborhoods still getting rezoned in 4, she said that Map 3 is going to be revisted. Map 3 has some very disruptive changes on it for that area, including split feeders and changing elementary schools to farther away schools. Map 5 is going to be interesting, especially if it reverts back to some of the major changes that were part of map 3, and allows neighborhoods that were moved in all the scenarios to remain.[/quote] I think she was referencing Rolling Valley using scenario 3. I would be shocked if they went back to that Hunt Valley plan of moving half the school to SoCo. [/quote] Didn’t Dr. Ried say at some point that scenario 3 for HV was an error?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics