Reply to I was an AP and now I'm a wife, AMA

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "I was an AP and now I'm a wife, AMA"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Funny how folks with most "honor and integrity" get cheated on most often, or better yet, cheat themselves. Is this some kind of reverse karma to teach them not to judge? :-)[/quote]

You just made that up.  :roll:  :roll:  :roll: 
[/quote]
Anecdotal doesn't equal made-up :P [/quote]

But it still equals a logical fallacy.

You can look up what that means.

[/quote]

You need to look up what boring means. Not everything is logical, my friend.[/quote]

Yeah, you should definitely Google logical fallacy, "friend" - since you clearly don't even understand why I said that. ([b]Hint: it's a logical fallacy because anecdotal evidence is meaningless[/b]).[/quote]

If you think this is a logical statement, you're in a world of your own...[/quote]

It's not only logical but true. Maybe you now need to look up the meaning of the word "hint," which should obviously imply to anyone capable of rational, linear thinking, that the onus is on the person claiming that anecdotes = statistically significant data to debunk themselves of that notion.

And I realize that now you will have to research the definition of these words: capable, rational, linear, onus, statistics, debunk, anecdotes, signicant. I should hope that you already know the meanings of imply, thinking, themselves, notion, etc. But given your inability to respond intelligently to any other post questioning why you cite random personal observations and claim them to be determinative, I might be too optimistic.  :lol: 
[/quote]

Or nerdy. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics