Reply to Pamela Geller is nuts

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pamela Geller is nuts"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]
She is a very vocal opponent of radical Islam. She is not an opponent of Islam, much to the left's chagrin. I think sane people are opponents of radical Islam. Doesn't the first amendment give both of them the same rights? Or does it only count if you support those rights? Seems to me, you feel the latter.

By the way? If you think we should be upholding the rights of radical Islamists, you're insane. [/quote]

Neither the school nor the cultural center involved "radical" Muslims. You can't run from the truth. Even you have said that the difference between "Islam" and "radical Muslims" is hair splitting. So, your attempt to distinguish in this manner is not very credible.
[/quote]

The ties are up for debate. The hair-splitting comes from the attempts of the left to accuse those who oppose radical islam of opposing all islam; [b]conservatives are quite clear on the fact that they differ.[/quote][/b]

Yes, quite clear  :roll:

http://allenbwest.com/2015/05/sharia-law-comes-to-walmart/

"There was a young man doing the checkout and another Walmart employee came over and put up a sign, “No alcohol products in this lane.” So being the inquisitive fella I am, I used my additional set of eyes — glasses — to see the young checkout man’s name. Let me just say it was NOT “Steve.”

I pointed the sign out to Aubrey and her response was a simple question, how is it that this Muslim employee could refuse service to customers based on his religious beliefs, but Christians are being forced to participate in specific events contrary to their religious beliefs?"[/quote]

Col. West is right. Why are Muslims are protected class in this country?[/quote]

The article goes on to state that checkers under 21 are not allowed to ring up alcohol.  So in other words, this is a total bust.[/quote]

In this situation, West was incorrect. Were the EEOC not suing a trucking company because Muslims refused to deliver alcohol (part of their job), it would be a non-issue.  Again, why are Muslims a protected class? Christians should be forced to bake cakes for gay weddings, but when Muslims refused....crickets.

The larger question, again, is why are Muslims (and gay people for that matter) a protected class? That's not really equality, is it?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics