Reply to The subtle micro aggressions of islamophobia

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "The subtle micro aggressions of islamophobia"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Honestly, the best advice I can give you is to read the ENTIRE books of the scholars I mentioned in this thread. They address all these topics through historical research and beautifully explain why the Quran mentioned these. It was not to support or encourage at all. However, for the person who refuses to read, but only wishes to google, cut, and paste, you will not understand. Historians and religious scholars have already done a fine job of explaining why the Quran mentioned these. Learn from them rather than spewing false information and pretending you are a historian or islam expert.[/quote]
What makes you think I haven't?

You are just like any other dawah-wallah I met, and I met many, many of them better than you.  If you tell them you disagree, they say it's because you haven't read enough - because clearly, someone who reads enough ABSOLUTELY will see think the way they do. (This is the point at which I begin to giggle pointedly). I've read more history and religious studies on the subject than you can possibly imagine.  So you have a good explanation of why these things are in the Quran. That doesn't mean they are good, make sense, or should be preserved, or mean anything at all.

Beauty is the eye of the beholder.[/quote]

Dawahwallah. That is a term which means one who propogates Islam. It is used by southeast Asians. Are you a person of a minority faith from a southeast Asian Muslim country? Were you mistreated in those countries? Could this be why you are so hateful of Islam?[/quote]

I'm not that PP, but I know what a wallah is. All it takes is a good vocabulary or a British background. (I have the latter (and I think my relatives at both Cambridge and Oxford would find your suggestion that their current and in some cases former profs are discussing DCUM to be knee-slapping hilarious, to borrow an American colloquialism.)[/quote]

You lost me. When did anyone say the scholars at Oxford would be discussing DCUM?[/quote]

OP said that scholars at Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard would all be discussing DCUM at her post at 11/07/2014 01:34 on page 16 of this thread,  here: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/225/420097.page[/quote]

Is this what you are referring to?

"You will be the anonymous face of islamophobia in articles and your posts will probably be used, right before quotes from scholars from prestigious institutions such as Cambridge, Oxford, and Harvard contradicting you. The goal will be to shed light on the new face of islamophobia but it will inevitably make a mockery of your posts. I apologize for that but this topic is too important and your posts illustrate all too well the prejudice and discrimination Muslims are up against. "

Once again, you misread. It does not say THEY would comment on DCUM. It says their comments would follow islamophobe's comments.

For example:

Dawah wallah rafidah using islamophobe: " Muslims made up the idea there was a jahiliyah, just to make it look like Islam elevated the status of women."

World renowned historian or religious scholar quote about the existence of jahiliyah and how it did elevate the status of women would immediately follow.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics