Reply to Should welfare recipients be required not to have children while on welfare? Agree or disagree? Why

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Should welfare recipients be required not to have children while on welfare? Agree or disagree? Why "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]While I agree that the government should stay out of reproductive issues, I still feel that we are in our rights to not provide government assistance (tax dollars) to those that continue to have kids when they can't afford their own basic needs (food, shelter, etc.). If youalready have kids and are down on your luck, absolutely you should get some help, but the second you pop out another mouth for us to feed, then your support ends.

Yeah, yeah "why punish the innocent child". I totally get that, but if the parents are that stupid to make the right decisions, then lets throw them on birth control and we'll make the decisions for them.

Laws do exist to prevent the dumb from killing themselves, such as seatbelts, so why not restrictions to prevent a burden, however slight, on our tax dollars. Not to mention that the odds are high that the vicious cycle will continue.

I bring this up when I found out that a co-worker of mine's daughter, who is 17, is having another baby by another boyfriend. The coworker is 34. Imagine being a grandma at 33. The daughter is on welfare and at the same time was getting tattoso, piercings, nails, hair dyes and cell phones since she kept losing them. She lives in subsidized housing and has a roomate that she collects from, the roomate paying more than what the daughter is paying for rent. 
The co-worker thinks it is great how smart her daughter is. Stupid breeds stupid.[/quote]

We spend billions of dollars every year giving foreign aid to countries that are poor as shit...did we tell the people in Afghanistan they had to stop fucking or we wouldn't give no more aid?
How bout that whole USA for Africa thing...y'all remember that?  I mean it wadn't tax dollars but still, we was sending aid and had Michael Jackson and all them celebrities singing talking about "We Are the World"...why didn't we also put in a verse telling them they had to stop fucking or they wouldn't get any funds?  
I'm being silly of course but think about it - why impose some gangsta shit like that here on our own soil that we wouldn't even impose on somebody else?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics