Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan New York City
Reply to "What Schools are Considered 2T?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This looks like a very specific DC Urban Moms / NYC private-school parent prestige ranking, not a ranking of current academic quality or where families are applying today. A few things jump out immediately: 1. Trevor at #35 is wildly out of sync with current reality That’s the biggest thing. Whether someone loves Trevor or not, putting it: * below Dwight * below Calhoun * below Lycée * below UNIS * below Xavier * below Fordham Prep * below Notre Dame would surprise most people involved in Manhattan admissions today. This feels like a ranking frozen around the early 2000s, when Trevor had a much weaker reputation. 2. Nightingale is too low Nightingale at #14 is hard to justify. Most current observers would place Nightingale closer to: * Dalton * Spence * Chapin * Sacred Heart than to schools ranked 15–25. 3. Sacred Heart is too low Same issue. Many NYC families would rank Sacred Heart above: * Marymount * Grace Church * Packer * Poly * Avenues without much hesitation. 4. Avenues is probably too low Avenues is polarizing, but #19 feels low. Many current families would place it somewhere in the 10–15 range. 5. Grace Church is probably too low Grace at #16 feels low given current demand and outcomes. 6. The top is mostly old-school prestige The placement of: * Trinity * Collegiate * Dalton * Spence * Brearley * Horace Mann * Chapin is very much a traditional prestige ranking. You can argue over the exact order, but that’s clearly the logic. What the ranking is really measuring If I had to guess, this ranking is measuring: “If you gathered wealthy NYC private-school alumni aged 50–75 and asked them to rank schools by prestige.” For that purpose, it actually makes sense. That’s why: * Trevor is #35. * Grace is #16. * Avenues is #19. * Nightingale is #14. * Sacred Heart is #13. Those schools have improved dramatically relative to where they sat in the old hierarchy. My biggest disagreement If we’re talking 2025–2026 perception among active Manhattan parents, I’d probably move: Up * Nightingale * Sacred Heart * Grace Church * Avenues * Trevor Down * Loyola (slightly) * Xavier * Notre Dame * Dwight * UNIS The Trevor placement is the one that makes me think the list is mostly historical prestige. I could see reasonable people putting Trevor at #10, #15, even #20. But #35 says more about where Trevor was a generation ago than where it is today. So my overall take is: As a historical-prestige ranking: 8/10. As a current-market Manhattan parent ranking: maybe 5/10. The further down the list you go, the more it seems to undervalue schools whose reputations have risen in the last 10–20 years.[/quote] Trevor isn't getting in the top 10-15 and Nightingale isn't move up much from 14. To me, those schools are where admission advisors want to tell their clients are good and upcoming schools to explain why they didn't get into a top 10/20 school. (nothing against those two schools we looked at them very closely and thought they would fit for our kids but found something slightly more appropriate)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics