Reply to Early Predictions 2028: AOC, Whitmer, Newsome or …?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Early Predictions 2028: AOC, Whitmer, Newsome or …?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As PP mentioned, it will be Rubio, not JD Vance who you have to contend with in 2028. And no one mentioned in this thread is that strong vs Rubio, especially in states like AZ, VA, and GA. People in VA and GA do not like Trump because of his personality; his “tell it like it is” boorishness plays better in the Blue Wall, not in the more mannered South, especially in the suburbs. Rubio doesn’t have that problem. Pair him with someone like Tulsi, another relatively young POC who’s a woman with appeal to independents and type of people who vote D but like RFK Jr and listen to Rogan, and Rubio will be very tough to beat. Dems need to remember that they should run really fast away from whoever inside the Beltway pols are  routing for because the rest of the country won’t like them. [/quote]

Oh boy you are drinking something strong if you think Rubio/Gabbard is a home run ticket[/quote]

Rubio would have beat Hillary in 2016 and was only sidelined because Trump is a generational political force, love him or hate him.
[/quote]

Sounds nice, but the reality is he would have lost.  Christie pointed out that he just had some nice sounding words.

Plus Hillary would have destroyed him on abortion, where Rubio was anti-abortion with no exception for rape.
Trump on abortion was both more moderate and more conservative than the field.  He had various exceptions, but also gave the most pro-life debate performance ever.
He really nailed the election when Chris Wallace went deep on the issue in the third debate.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics