Reply to Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yikes, this takedown of the MoCo attorney by Gorsuch was brutal.

[twitter]https://x.com/cspan/status/1914755396885209158[/twitter][/quote]

Unreal that *anyone* would think that book is appropriate for the classroom.[/quote]

Have you read the book?  It’s literally an A to Z book that points out zero controversial things.  The appendix of the books let you look for other things in the pictures and again, nothing controversial.   There is no bondage is the book.[/quote]

Yes, I've read the book.  Please stop gaslighting.  Telling readers to look for "leather, lip ring, and underwear" (among other "vocabulary" words) is insanity.  [/quote]

Also “intersex flag,” “drag king,” and “drag queen.”

[/quote]

Again, point to the page where this is required.  A teacher could read the book and never ask this.  Also is leather inherently a problem?  Women walk around with leather purses all the time. Folks wear leather pants.  Why is lip ring any worse than earring or bracelet?
Why is drag king or queen any worse than find the clown?[/quote]

DP.  You have issues.  Enough said.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics