Reply to New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Only a few more weeks to see how this plays out [/quote]

[b]Sounds like GA is positioned best on the girls side.[/b] Really interested to see how this plays out![/quote]

Huh?  GA is a second tier girls league making desperate moves after losing many of their best teams last year.  They added a ton of mediocre clubs last year and continue to face an uphill battle.[/quote]

City SC, CUP, IMG, TopHat, Lou Fusz, FL United are better clubs than 90% of ECNL… they can all hang with the big dogs…and that’s without having ECNL….

Most clubs would’ve crumbled by now. [/quote]

Cherry-picking the remaining top 6 clubs in GA doesn't make the league as strong as ECNL.  Sure, the top handful could succeed in ECNL, but it's a fast drop-off after that, and the last 2/3 of GA is just not good.  Like the last 1/3 of ECNL.[/quote]
What you're missing is the top GA clubs exist on their own. They'd be good in any league the play in.

MLSN is now partnered with GA. How many clubs do you think ECNL has strong armed into participating in boys ECNL if they want girls ECNL? If there's more than one someone is going to jump at the chance to play MLSN. If ECNL drops their girls in retaliation they'll go to GA.

ECNL can't retaliate on everyone that switches to MLSN or they'll send even more to GA.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics