Reply to Kamala Harris owns a gun. Are you surprised or mad?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Kamala Harris owns a gun. Are you surprised or mad?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So gun nutters are literal about the 2nd amendment except for the militia part and choose to just ignore the change in technology. Got it. You’ve twisted yourself into a pretzel to defend your love of killing machines. Cherry picking to justify the indefensible.  No other civilized society lives like this and it’s all to make the NRA and gun manufacturers rich.

Apples to oranges poster is correct. But that thinking is too complex for gun nuts.

[/quote]

If you're going down the militia route, then you should agree that everyone has the rights to have the same weapons as the military because in military service you brought your own weapons to train and fight with. And you would support everyone regularly meeting up to train [/quote]

Why doesn't everyone have the same rights to weapons in the military, even with 2a? [/quote]

No, m4s are not available for civilian purchase. [/quote]

To clarify, M-4 carbines are available to law enforcement agencies, which are “civilian” organizations.

M-4 clones built on fully automatic receivers registered before the number of such receivers was frozen are probably available.

[/quote]

What's the going price on a pre 86 receiverand the availability ? Even then you'd be nuts for actually using the lower for militia training given the value. It's not a realistic option.

I've never understood why miller wasn't used for support of the 2nd amendment to overcome the 86 ban.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics