Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Travel Discussion
Reply to "Ready to be done with Disney "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You ask him. He can confirm I am an attorney from my previous posts, and probably that I went to HLS if he bothers to go back far enough. I hope he doesn’t waste his time.[/quote] You don’t understand. I believe you. It just makes it that much more pathetic that you don’t understand basic evidentiary procedures.[/quote] On the court of law that is DCUM? Lol.[/quote] No — you were wrong on where burden of proof lies. That’s really it. [/quote] No, I am not. There is no burden of proof in an online discussion of whether Disney sucks. That’s what you don’t seem to understand.[/quote] No. You described how it would work if it was a case and incorrectly stated that I have a burden of proof. I don’t. I’m the defense.[/quote] You described it and I was making fun of you (both). You do have a burden of proof. In an actual case, if the plaintiff establishes a possibly criminal event occurred, then you have the burden as defense to establish your reasons why the thing the plaintiff established doesn’t count. Burden-shifting is very common. Happens all the time. Imagine a case in which a person shoots another person. Murder automatically? No. The prosecutor can establish the person was shot by the defendant. But that is not enough. The burden then shifts to the defense to prove it was justified. It is an “affirmative defense” that yes, the defendant shot the victim, but there was an exculpatory reason, such as insanity or self-defense. [/quote] Prosecution has to initially clear a minimum burden of proof, though, and you clearly haven’t. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics