Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "APS and new healthcare provider"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]APS teacher of 10 years here - and I am beyond embarrassed by how outraged my colleagues are acting. I am actually happy about the switch to Blue Cross Blue Shield. In previous jobs I've held, insurance carriers have switched, and it hasn't been a big deal. Everyone saying they need days and days off to search for new doctors is beyond ridiculous. I watched the school board comments and I cringed. A small group of APS teachers act so outraged over EVERYTHING and they give the rest of us a bad reputation. Just want people to know we aren't all this crazy. And the people who speak at school board meetings (including one very vocal teacher) - DO NOT represent the majority of teachers in APS. [/quote] Thank you! I'm so happy that none of them work in my school.[/quote] “The people at the top DO respond to pressure from the bottom, yet the people at the bottom don’t have time or mental energy to fight back or to change how the interact or question why things are done the way they are done. This is how oppressive systems work and the reason they stay functioning. We need people from the bottom to rise up.” Why do you have a problem with people speaking out about their experience? I didn’t speak out (except for here) and will have to take some leave. I don’t think it ridiculous to state that I am going to need more sub coverage during a sub and staffing shortage. What I am attempting to prevent is kids losing more time learning. We are also pointing out that there are effects from this change, and that classroom teachers shouldn’t constantly be expected to take the brunt of those systemic changes. They should plan in some way for some teachers to need time off. Others don’t need subs and will not have the same consequences.[/quote] Because it’s done as a threat to parents “call the school board or your child will miss out on instruction” It makes us all look bad. Misinformation is being spread about why Kaiser didn’t bid. They are in a strike due to overwork- have any of the people screaming conspiracy considered that Kaiser didn’t want us?[/quote] I agree that parent’s should be involved as this is within APS, but I also think as employees when we see this coming down the line, if we say nothing to admin, that is a problem too. I wrote to HR (and on here) and kept it to that. I don’t expect parents to care or do anything, but I also think it is my duty to tell admin that I will need some time off and that others probably will too because of the policy change. I don’t want my kid with multiple therapies to not get those. [/quote] Do you have to take time off now for those therapies? If so how is it any different? [/quote] You’ve never switched providers? There is usually some lead time to get in as a new patient to establish care. Potentially delays in medications as well. It’s not trivial. [/quote] Yes I have. We have 90 days, and an additional 90 if covered under continuity of care. The vast majority of us who aren’t Jewish have today to call[/quote] Ok, well I have already explained about this earlier in the thread and yes, it will be necessary for me to be there for the initial intake appointments because that is what the therapists (OT, PT, BCBA) do. Then we can establish weekly appointments after school, but you have to have the initial appointment and the screening is a longer appointment and usually done during the day. Look, fight me all you want, question my ability to make appointments for special needs kids if you need to, but I am truly only trying to explain the situation and give a realistic view of my leave. Of course I will do my best, but again, I also think it is my job to give a heads up during a sub shortage that I will need more coverage because of the switch. [/quote] I hear your stress. I hope this is helpful to you and not annoying. I have taken multiple children to PT and OT and had to switch providers. Typically, the new provider does not do a whole new intake. I have BCBS- plans vary a little so play a lot of attention to the brochure- I have not needed a referral for OT. The PT referral is just a prescription from a doctor. If your child already has a PT referral, just get a copy of it from Kaiser- BCBS isn't a closed system like Kaiser so they will take the Kaiser referral. At least among PT's I know, they view BCBS as the 'gold standard' for coverage- the easiest to work with. When we have switched, the new therapist picks up the plan and notes from the old therapist- they might do a 'mini-intake' but its not as involved as the first one and generally done at a regular appointment. For child OTs and PT's Good Beginnings in Falls Church is a solid practice with a lot of providers. I have made an 'advance' appointment with them when I was waiting for new insurance to kick in. In terms of ABA therapy- I honestly don't know what BCBS covers- I would check the brochure really carefully. That being said- I thought Kaiser contracted with ABA therapists rather than having them in house- so you don't necessarily need to switch ABA therapists. [/quote] NP That’s helpful information. I think people who have been with Kaiser a long time don’t realize how restrictive it can be. Plus as you mentioned they contract out a lot of therapies including some mental health. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics