Reply to Danny Masterson

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Danny Masterson"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Don’t know if this has been said yet, but it’s crazy to put someone away for 30 years without hard evidence.  [/quote]

It’s hard to discount multiple women testifying that they were drugged and raped by him even if there was no dna evidence.  I don’t know who else the jury heard from. But maybe other people corroborated their experiences. [/quote]

Even if true, 30 years is too harsh of a sentence for something like this, especially since it occurred over 20 years ago.  And it was a few women, not “multiple”, who all knew each other and could have possibly corroborated their stories.  [/quote]

Look, it went to trial and the jury found him guilty. Evidence was presented, including testimony from the accusers and the defendant’s counsel had the opportunity to cross examine them. Danny had the opportunity to testify and present his side of the story and he chose not to. He willingly allowed the jury to only hear the accusers’ sides. There was also a lot more evidence that hasn’t been frequently discussed. Have you actually read more on the trial? Sorry if this isn’t enough for you, but it was for the jury. This is how the court system works. If Danny didn’t want a jury, he could have opted for a bench trial, which he also didn’t do.

So, Danny opted for a jury trial, of a jury made of his peers that his attorneys helped select, chose not to testify and those jurors heard the case and decided he was guilty. You weren’t on the jury. He received a fair trial. Now he lives with the conviction. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics