Reply to NYT Opinion Piece: This Isn’t What Millennial Middle Age Was Supposed To Look Like

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "NYT Opinion Piece: This Isn’t What Millennial Middle Age Was Supposed To Look Like"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am 34 and I am NOT middle aged. F off. [/quote]

Haaaaaaaa. Sorry, kiddo. Reality Bites. [/quote]
34 is not middle aged. Just stop it. Not all of us were born as 60 year old women like you were. [/quote]

There truly are no heroes in this argument.  Not the pedantic nut who insists on [b]dividing life expectancy by three and calling the middle third "middle aged."[/b]  And not the 30-something who viewed being middle-aged as the worst possible state, which speaks to a deep insecurity on her part (especially the early mention of her perky breasts and flat stomach).  But I guess when all you have is your looks, you invest your whole self-worth in them.  Hard to see how that will turn out well.  [/quote]

np. Is that not the most logical definition? What would you suggest?[/quote]

I think middle aged is a social construct, so I'd lean more towards 45-50.  But the most important point is that I really, truly, don't give two sh!ts what anyone considers middle-aged.  It has no impact on my life, or anyone else's  - which is why the people arguing vehemently about it are the true nitwits of this thread.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics