Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Arlington "missing middle""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They have given the thumbs up to the proposal and the middle finger to current residents. At least there will be an annual cap to the permits and a design book that developers and future slumlords will have to choose from. https://www.arlnow.com/2023/03/09/arlington-planning-commission-gives-thumbs-up-to-missing-middle-zoning-changes/[/quote] Many current residents support the proposal.[/quote] Current apartment renters. Basically builders started with urban village model (high density tapering off from transit hubs) which is a very sensible model, and built higher and higher, and then courted those rental “residents” to support high density in all of Arlington, abandoning smart growth and urban village. [/quote] Residents are residents, no? Or do only some residents count as residents?[/quote] I wonder if those apartment dwellers who supposedly support the proposal were informed that missing middle housing will start at $600K for a one bedroom.[/quote] I wonder if you have been paying any attention at all to the many residents of Arlington who have actually showed up to support the proposal, which has now been adopted.[/quote] Adoption by the planning commision is not the board vote whch is 3/18. P a47 on unit by type, income, price, rent https://arlington.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=44&event_id=1871&meta_id=216655 The fact is ARL has no one to blame but itself for the max out on impervious surface for the tear downs. 3 bedroom ranch does not become a 2 story on the same footprint with the prior usable yard square footage. Hence it is /was they buy for less than 1m , tear down, build to the max for 2.5m plus. Frankly missing middle will result in build to the max with more vehicles. So that Mckinley monster would be 8 cars instead of 2-3.[/quote] And fewer spaces mandated for off street parking. It’s really going to class up the neighborhoods. Don’t forget all of your new friends with barking dogs![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics