Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Middle school magnets - criteria-based"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]To my understanding, the in-bounds and out-of-bounds pools are not merged after initial selection, except, perhaps, in following years (i.e., starting in 7th). Of course, there is almost no reason for an in-bounds family to reject the offer, so getting off their wait list ends up being harder. Even with that, though, and with, say a 40% offer rejection rate for out-of-bounds, as some prefer to stay local due to commute, friends, quality of local programming, etc., the additional opportunity to be offered an out-of-bounds spot after 3 rounds would be about an additional 6% probability (identified for the pool) or about another percent (all students), for total opportunity of about 16% (identified) or a bit under 2.5% (all students) for out-of-catchment folks when comparing to about 68% (identified) or 9% (all students) from the TPMS catchment, assuming a similar 13% proportion of students placed in the pool. Numbers not exact, of course -- back of the envelope. They did away with the brief period where they considered local cohort (if there were enough students who would be at your local school to manage a separate enriched class) when they went to the lottery. The first lottery pool had many more in it than last year's/this year's because they threw a very wide net, not having confidence in the highly-pandemic impacted data that year. They also did away with ability measures like CogAT, but that is another subject.[/quote] I have kids in the program, and it seems like they improved their selection process in the second year. This is completely anecdotal and maybe even wishful since I don't have data just observations my kids relayed. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics