Reply to Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just doing my daily check in to see if any actual evidence has emerged as to who the leaker is.  No?  Didn't think so.  I'll check back tomorrow![/quote]
Did you do your daily check in? It seems like you might have some opportunities to be fed evidence you will enthusiastically ignore.  :lol:

[twitter]https://twitter.com/MondaireJones/status/1598348561040740352?cxt=HHwWgMC4gYjjvK4sAAAA[/twitter][/quote]

I will be waiting eagerly for any hard evidence to be presented.  Thanks for the heads up![/quote]

I’m curious what evidence would be acceptable to you. There’s probably no recording and probably nothing in writing, so what would be hard proof other than a confession? [/quote]
DP. There’s nothing at all. The party that chants “lock her up” and believes in Q’a adrenochrome harvesting demands proof and by that they mean that even if emails among Alito, Ginni and Clarence surfaced and they all admitted it under oath, pp would still not believe it.

And for that troubled soul who will get his dander up no, I don’t believe those three conspired. I’m just pointing out how Repos will believe anything their party shovels at them, proof free.[/quote]

That is true. Look at all that is happening with Trump. Even "proof" will not be good enough. They will just stick their fingers in their ears and go about their way. Proving stuff to randos is to keep non Repubs busy. In reality, they never cared.
[/quote]

I’m the pp who asked. That’s what I feel like too. I was just curious if any of them would answer. I mean, even if they gave an answer I know the goalposts would be moved when the time comes. [/quote]

Except that at least two people have responded to your question - you seem to be conveniently ignoring those answers while you and your pal concoct bizarre flights of fancy to suit your narrative.  Present some actual proof.  That’s not too much to ask, and you know it.  If an outlandish claim was being made about one of the liberal justices, you’d say exactly the same thing.  Talk about moving goalposts.   :roll: [/quote]

The two responses between my question and that response were agreeing with me, not saying what’s acceptable proof from a conservative perspective. I quoted one of the responses.  I didn’t ignore them. I really don’t understand what you’re trying to say. If there are answers to my question, after I asked it and before my 11:53 post, I don’t see them. Sorry. [/quote]

22:51 states very clearly that they would be happy to admit they were wrong if it turns out they were.  I wasn’t talking about responses to your 11:53 post, just that if you’ve read the whole thread, you’re ignoring that post and others.  It’s just one big circle jerk here.[/quote]

Then they didn’t actually respond to my question, which is what you said. And saying they’ll admit they’re wrong if it’s proved to their satisfaction is different from saying what proof they’ll accept as satisfactory. So basically none of what you said was true, but [b]I’m the circle jerking, truth ignoring poster, but you’re the honest, attention to detail, unbiased poster? [/b]😂 [/quote]

Yes.  Yes you are.  Continuing to childishly insist someone is guilty, with not a shred of real evidence, makes you "truth ignoring," and more.  I'll wait until all the facts and proof come out, one way or the other.  Feel free to continue your usual rampage, claiming people are guilty with absolutely no hard evidence.[/quote]

I never said he was guilty. I asked what would be acceptable proof considering they probably didn’t record their own conversations. You said my question was addressed and it wasn’t. I even apologized if I had overlooked a response, but I hadn’t. You then called me names and said I did some things I didn’t. And now you’re saying I’m insisting Ali to use guilty with no hard evidence. We’ve come full circle. What evidence would you accept, given that absolute proof (a video or audio recording) probably doesn’t exist. Would it take a confession from someone involved? Confessions from all involved? Someone on the inside referencing it in an email and no one denying it until the email is public?  All I’ve been asking is what would it take to prove it? You’ve made false accusations and moved the goalposts instead of answering so I assume that either nothing would prove it or whatever standard you set will change if it’s ever met. And honestly, I’d respect you more if you came out and said nothing could prove it to me short of a video, not even confessions from all involved because confessions could be coerced. I’d think you’re nutty, but I’d respect your self awareness and honesty. [/quote]

Interesting.  I've read and re-read all my responses.  Not once did I call you a name - how bizarre to make that claim when anyone can read the posts and see that you are wrong.  As for proof, I have stated several times that until some hard evidence is presented, you have no way to prove Alito is the leaker.  [b]An email, a confession from the parties involved - those would be considered evidence in a court of law.[/b]  What you have is an accusation - by ONE person - and a whole lock of rabid, partisan speculation (and clearly, wishful thinking).

And speaking of moving goalposts - you seem to be a master at it.  Every time someone answers your question, as I have done several times, YOU either ignore it or twist it to suit your narrative.  I'm going to bold my answer for you so you can refer back to it the next time you want to pretend it hasn't been answered.  You're welcome.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics