Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Elite Colleges’ Quiet Fight to Favor Alumni Children"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My husband was a first gen, non-legacy at a selective private university. Very poor. Now his son will be non-preferred over a non-legacy according to the school’s prez. We are not a wealthy, privileged family, but he is a legacy. Not all legacies are rich and entitled. The school wants no legacies. Seriously f’d up.[/quote] Good. Why should he be "preferred"?[/quote] Two equal candidates, they will automatically take the non-legacy. The non-legacy is the one automatically preferred even if stats slightly lower.[/quote] Why should a school not give someone new an opportunity? [/quote] Both students are new. Neither should be punished or declined merely for who their parents are or whether or not the parents are alum. Things should be 100% merit based. It’s 2022. Bring back test scores too.[/quote] But the admission is already merit based. You seem to equate merit with grades and scores. Merit to schools means special. Your child needs to be special. Having a perfect SAT score, like thousands of others in the country, is not special and will not get them admitted. [/quote] +1000 Wouldn't want to attend college where everyone had a 1600 and 4.0. But each T20 school could fill their freshman classes with students just like that (or very close to it). [b]People need to get over the idea that there is a huge difference in intelligence between a 1500 and 1600 (98% vs 99%+)[/b], but there really isn't---the 1600 is likely just a better test taker. Both kids are extremely smart. Holistic admissions creates a much more balanced class. It would be boring if a university had only 3 clubs, because that's all the kids are interested in. Diversity on all levels makes life much more worth it and more enjoyable, and prepares your kids for real life where diversity abounds.[/quote] Let’s assume you’re correct in that assessment (I happen to disagree), that’s not really what we’re talking about here. The number of URM kids with 1500+, great grades and APs etc is minuscule. When they look at the impact AA on admissions it’s on the order of 300 points. So, do you think a kid with a 1300 is just as intelligent as a kid with a 1600?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics