Reply to well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He’d been investigated six times before, or did you miss that little nugget?[/quote]
This is like communicating with an eight year old. It’s been pointed out on this thread that he had background investigations. How these work is that you, the one being investigated, provides an address where you’ve lived for the last x years and the name of a person you were acquainted with at that address. So for most of these, his time in high schoo, wouldn’t even have come up and if he didn’t supply Christine Blasey Ford’s name - and why would you give the name of someone you sexually assaulted? - it wouldn’t come up. The background investigator comes and asks your friends or family or whoever you listed a set series of questions, the end. Some branches require polygraphs, but he was appointed to many of the positions that necessitated the background and those aren’t usually poly’d. It’s not a thorough investigation meant to turn up everything in your life.

And AGAIN: the WH severely limited the scope and duration of the investigation of the CBF incident. It was not investigated,[/quote]

Exactly. 10000000x AGAIN. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics