Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Where do you consider MCPS high schools on a scale of good-bad"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^ but I completely agree the 25% mark seems to be the magic number to which the county should strive for since it seems to benefit the kids [/quote] There aren’t enough rich kids for the east county’s slipping demographics [/quote] There are words for people who think that some demographic groups are better than other demographic groups, though. Also, you're behind the times.[/quote] Realists? Demographics don’t always equal race They can also represent poverty, non-Native speakers, education levels, intact house holds or criminality rates. Those are all increasing in wrong directions in the eastern and northern parts of MoCo. If you think of a particular race for any of those then you are the racist. But the plan the export those to the west’s schools won’t change your neighborhood or help those kids. It will just mask a few of them in superior sastistics. There will be plenty of poor kids to back fill them in the DCC. That is really the problem here right? [b]The rich suburban schools of yesteryear are now devolving to poor urban-ish schools [/b]as wealth migrates back into the cities. The middle class remaining wonder what is happening and look west and see what they thought they were buying into and wonder why those got to resist the change. Mean while no matter how you bus, rezone, balance or breakup, the county will have a title 1 middle school in the not to distant future and most likely a high school soon after. The county is gaining poor people quicker than rich people and they live in just a few areas because the metro is so pricy. But careful punishing the rich people, if an exodus occurs [b]it will only speed the decay[/b].[/quote] You're doing it again.[/quote] F off snowflake. People like you are part of the problem. Can’t fix a problem that can’t be spoken about or doesn’t exist :roll: [/quote] I’m not the person you’re arguing with but your use of “snowflake” outs you as a biased source as far as I’m concerned. Clearly, people understand that demographics are changing. The suburbanization of poverty is a real trend across the country. But you are the one stating minority = poor = bad = failure. How exactly does it work that schools that have physically remained in the same place in the suburbs are now “urban-ish” unless urban is the dog whistle for not white? We get it. Schools in MCPS are less white. Many of us — even white people — think that’s fine. Children aren’t “decay.” Let’s all get on board with solutions for how to best educate the children who actually live in the county.[/quote] So I guess we are going to have to agree on what constitutes education? Right now all kids are getting educated but yet something isn’t right according to who? Maybe it is the college for all model doesn’t apply to poor kids who most don’t go to college? Maybe it is the test score/FARM rate ranking system that rubs people the wrong way that causes the glaring SES stratification. Maybe it because softies like you confuse equal access with equal opportunities let alone equal outcomes the last two are but pipe dreams in resource contrived meritocracies. All things are not equal, poor does equal failure at a much higher proclivity and too many poor people can and do crash systems (not just educational) . Those are the facts based off of every historical measure. The county is getting in influx of people who fall below the regional middle class threshold. When you have more not middle class people logic states the ability to maintain an iconic middle class school system will be challenged. If you then turn around and compare the first changed schools to the legacy/richer schools it makes it look like the schools are slipping but is it really the schools? Do you think it is realistic to replicate Whitman in Langley Park with all the school funds possible? Most educators don’t. If the county becomes bifurcated the schools will and have followed, mix all you want but rich people tend to stay one step ahead, always have always will. You’re chasing the systemic ghosts of social engineering with new and different social engineering. But nothing you do will fundamentally move the needle for poor kids in a society with not nearly as much social mobility as people pretend it has. And mixing the metrics to obscure the early schools in trouble won’t stop more poor kids from coming in and dropping test scores in predictable curves. I assure you they aren’t moving to Chevy Chase. Also point out where I correlated failure to race? Your own stereotypes color your comprehension. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics