Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Rape and Abortion"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]On one hand, I have some (very teeny tiny amount of) respect for "pro-life" people who do not support abortion exceptions in the case of rape or incest - at least they're being consistent. But personally, I 1000xinfinity support a woman's right to choose to terminate a pregnancy, any time, and unquestionably for a pregnancy incurred via rape. A woman comes first - always. The woman is a person. If something cannot exist in any rudimentary form without being physically dependent on a specific person, then it is not an "individual" and thus not a person. [/quote] Are you ideologically consistent? Are severally disabled humans and newborn infants not persons in your view? What about severally premature babies? None of these can survive in any kind of rudimentary form. [/quote] Yes, I am ideologically consistent. Severely disabled humans, newborn infants, nor severely premature babies are completely and totally physically dependent on a very specific, non-interchangeable person. [/quote] That's a meaningless distinction to the "non-person" whose "personhood" you are trying to determine. [/quote] Not at all. If something cannot even exist without being wholly physically dependent on a specific, non-interchangeable person, then that something is not an individual, and does not have individual rights, and is not a "person." [/quote] No, it is a meaningless distinction. a being who cannot survive but for the intervention of interchangeable persons is functionally no different than a being who cannot survive but for the intervention of a specific person. You try to frame this issue on the basis of survival or viability, but the really point for you is who carries the burden of providing for that survival. This is particularly weird given that in 96% of unplanned pregnancies, the specific person who is required to provide survival played a direct role in creating the situation in the first place. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics