Reply to Paul Manafort's lucrative Russian connections

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Paul Manafort's lucrative Russian connections"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Actually...according to cables released by wikileaks, he was a source for US information
https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/760111699936550912

He wasn't some Russian spy, he was the US embassies source in the Ukraine.

[/quote]

This of course assumes Wikileaks is a fully honest broker themselves. [/quote]

They can't be any less trusted than the NY Times at this point.  [/quote]

The NY Times doesn't hack emails.  Wikileaks sole purpose is to do exactly that.  Say what you will about the Times, they are still much more reliable than Wikileaks.[/quote]
The NY times based a hot piece off a pice of paper that was handwritten.  No forensic evidence found for the transactions other than conjecture.
[/quote]
The story came from Ukrainian investigators, so it's well sourced.

[quote]
More to the point, [b]wikileaks doesn't hack, they just publish.[/b]  It shows how uninformed you are.  The state dept cables are there to read and it shows Manafort was our source being utilized by the State Dept.[/quote]
Stop nitpicking, you knew what I meant.  And at best, they show Manafort trying to play both sides, which makes him even less reliable than if he were just working for the Ukrainian dictator.[/quote]
Except he didn't and you don't have proof, other than a handwritten ledger.  Even they claim they have no records of transactions.  You're grasping...[/quote]

So other than written proof, there is no proof?  Hate to tell you this, but handwritten ledgers are admissible in a court of law, and many people have gone to jail based on them.  And of course they have no record of transaction. They were CASH payments.  If there was even a hint that Hillary Clinton had received $12.7 million in cash from anyone, you'd be hitting the roof.[/quote]

I guess you haven't paid attention to the Clinton Foundation, Uranium deals an so on.

Hand written ledgers hold no legitimacy.  The 9-11 hijackers got payments in cash from the Saudis and we tracked that. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics