Reply to Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]THIS IS NOT AN "ARTICLE." It is one guy's OPINION.

Sorry for yelling.[/quote]

Excuse me but I feel compelled to help you understand what "article" means:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/article[/quote]

I feel confident that the Wall Street Journal knows the difference, and not because some moron provides the dictionary.com definition. Jesus, people.[/quote]

What are you talking about? Yes, this ARTICLE appeared in the OPINION section. Why do you think written compositions published in the opinion section are no longer "articles?"[/quote]

I am the "moron" who posted the dictionary link. Apparently there are other "morons" here who agree with the dictionary and myself on the definition of "article." An opinion piece is, in fact, an "article" as long as it is non-fiction and it appears in a publication with other "articles."[/quote]

Of course. Everyone knows there's zero difference between the news articles the Wall Street Journal publishes and the opinion pieces they choose for their op-ed page.[/quote]

It is accurate to say that it is an opinion piece and to then disagree with the stated opinions. It is not accurate to say it isn't an article. I really don't know if the author is correct that there is any chance that Clinton won't be the nominee but I think it is an interesting topic for discussion and the author makes some good points. I hope that the DNC is beginning to wake up to the possibility that Clinton will not beat Trump. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics