Reply to Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"I know you have consistently stated that you prefer Clinton to me, but here me out: Why don't you vote against your own stated interest in order to disenfranchise all the voters who agree with you?" Brilliant.[/quote]
Well when you consider HRC only has about 4% more pledged delegates than Sanders, the Sanders camp would only need to persuade 4.1% of the superdelegates to vote against their constituents. Not unheard of when you consider they routinely do this on other issues that go against the majority.[/quote]
This is just Bernie math, PP. Come on. Clinton is less than 70 delegates short of clinching. You really think hundreds or superdelegates are all of a sudden going to say, hey, we don't care about the millions of voters who prefer Hillary. We're going to take the nomination away from the woman who earned it - the one who would be the first female major-party nominee in history - and hand it to a man who joined the Democratic Party in 2015!

That is so not happening. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics