Reply to Will the PCSB move to force LAMB to back-fill after PK4?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Will the PCSB move to force LAMB to back-fill after PK4?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why mess with something that is working?

-Not a lamb parent / shut out at pk3 and pk4[/quote]

Because it is possible that these barriers to access are a fundamental reason that it is working. And that is pretty important - both for LAMB and for other schools whose metrics are compared to LAMB's (see: charter school tiering process).[/quote]

Put all the other Tier 1 elementary schools don't have the same policies. LAMB is an outlier. And now that other Montessori and immersion schools have come along and proven that you can be successful without these barriers it's harder for LAMB to argue in favor of them.

[/quote]

Except, as the LAMB admin tried to explain last night - other schools aren't doing both immersion and montessori.  Just because you successfully integrate a 6 year old in an immersion setting or a montessori setting, doesn't necessarily mean you can do both at the same time.  [/quote]

BFD. Yu Ying does Mandarin AND the IB, which is every bit as complex. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics