Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Stanford or UMBC?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Stanford. Her average peer at Stanford will be overwhelmingly of higher academic caliber than her average peer at UMBC. Also, the resources at Stanford are simply in a different league altogether--the two schools aren't even in a comparable cohort of schools. -Professor at research u.[/quote] Another prof here. Unless you or your daughter are somehow concerned she couldn't cut it at stanford, it's worth it. She'd be exposed to a completely different, really special peer group at Stanford that would be her network starting out and later on. And the standards she be held to would be really extreme. I have had many PhD students, and honestly my experience is that [b]middle of the road students from places like Stanford often outpace the 4.0 students from places like UMBC. [/b] I don't think it's because the stanford students are necessarily more gifted, but that they learned something good at these places. I agree that it's not a guaranteed ticket to greatness, and UMBC is in no way a ticket to something other than greatness. But you're definitely tilting the odds in making this choice. At least from the perspective of a researcher. Iv'e worked in industry too and I think the needs are a little bit more different. But if you daughter wants to be a biology major (did I read that?) then she wants to do research (or medicine, which will be similar). Stanford will be worth it. [/quote] Yet research shows the exact opposite. A top student at UMD outpaces a middle student from an Ivy. Funny how 1 persons perception is so inaccurate, I suspect that is why eyewitness accounts are so inaccurate.[/quote] Not all UMD's are the same. UMBC is very different than College Park. For medicine, I care where my doctors go to school. If I had a choice between Stanford and UMBC, I'd choose the Stanford doctor. In many professions, it doesn't matter where you go to school but for medicine it does.[/quote] I would take a self confident UMBC doctor to a self defeated Stanford doctor any day of the week. Truthfully I don't choose a doctor by where they attended school but where they practice, how much research they have published and personal recommendations... When it matters... Meaning not for a cold but for cancer. [b]I was just pointing out your point has been disproven in research.[/b]... And at the time of the research umCP was ranked about the same as UMBC is today. [/quote] I don't know that that is true. No one has broken down where you went to college vs. success in x profession, just lifetime earnings. Being a successful PhD student is not related to long term earnings.[/quote] The measurement was by published articles. Also they follow drop out rates from programs. A top student at UMD is more successful than everybody in IVY minus the top 5 percent because of perceived success... aka confidence is shaken when a top student falls to the middle. It's how ivys justify athletes, they don't mind being on the bottom/middle. No self confidence problem there.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics