Reply to Wounded Warrior Project under investigation

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Wounded Warrior Project under investigation "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wait a minute.  Before you bitch about lavish parties, how much do those parties raise?  60% is not bad.  Organizations need to run and have overhead.  If they went out of business, how much would go to vets?

NONE![/quote]

You're welcome to think this way, but I work too hard for my money to give it to an organization that keeps 40% or more for overhead, parties, etc. I prefer to give to a local organization that's smaller--like a local tutoring group that works with children from a particular school in the afternoons or a local residence for children who have been removed from their homes by DFCS. [/quote]

This is ridiculous and why most charities can't make an impact.  Dan Pallotta has written extensively about this.  You want the best professionals, but you don't want to pay them.  You would rather pay someone $40K and get mediocre instead of someone with an advanced degree.  If I spend $5 million on fundraising, but raise $70M, isn't that better than spending $100K on fundraising and raising $2 million?  Which way gets more money to the vets.  I know the second makes you feel better, but the first has more of an impact.

[/quote]

And if I spend 100k on fundraising and raise 100M isn't that even better?  Are we just making up numbers?    And I doubt anyone would have a problem with spending 5 mil to raise 70 mil if 65 mil went tpo programs for the vets, but that is not what is happening.

And the parties that are the source of criticism are not fundraisers.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics