Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Wounded Warrior Project under investigation "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] You'd be considered extremely naive. That's absolutely nothing wrong with protecting a brand you've created. Allowing other groups to infringed on your name, at risk of tarnishing it should be just as big of a liability to donors and potential donors. Also little wrong with working with celebrity endorsers. Fact is, it would be more shameful of the celebrity to charge full price for this work. I would imagine the work is being done in concert with their CPA.[/quote] This argument is ridiculous. You are saying that it makes sense for them to spend big bucks to develop a "brand" and then to spend big bucks to "protect" the brand. They don't need an effing "brand" [b]and they certainly don't need to argue with other groups helping vets-- they just need to actually help vets, and everyone will be happy to help them.[/b] I also like how on the one hand you tell us it would be "shameful" for a celebrity to charge full price for this work, but on the other hand the message is that they need to pay top dollar to their execs and run it like a business. Why is it shameful for a celebrity to charge full price, but not for the charity to spend money on unnecessary CEO perks?[/quote] +1 Exactly!! [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics