Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Emotional Labor - a good read for men AND women"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What I get out of it is the emotional well being of people I care about / the improvement of my family unit. [b]Which is important enough for me to do some of these things myself[/b], but doesn't remove the resentment that my spouse has externalized the costs of these efforts to me.[/quote] I'm the PP you are replying to, and I go back to my point you get something out of it (bolded above). The answer is really simple: either it's important enough [i]to you[/i] to do it, or it's not important enough. If it's not important enough to your husband to do himself (on point to my response #5) or to ask you to do for him (in which case he damn well ought to express gratitude), then you shouldn't presume it on his behalf (and be resentful). [quote=Anonymous]As a number of people in the MetaFilter discussion thread pointed out, children really change the dynamics / calculus of these discussions. For example in the case of ILs maintaining connections via DILs - yes you can push back against this, but if you value the relationship between your children and their grandparents a lot of women will suck it up and carry their husbands portion of the burden so that the children don't suffer.[/quote] I agree that children are higher stakes (they are absolutely a shared project and hopefully of greater importance than anything else to the parents) but the same basic dynamic applies. The ILs discussion is a classic case where boundaries are called for - it's on each partner to maintain/run interference/be the primary point of contact with their own FOO. It is a boundary violation on the part of ILs (either DIL or FIL/MIL) to circumvent that. For all you know, no matter how [i]you value[/i] "the relationship between your children and their grandparents", the grandparent's child may not want that relationship, and they may have reasons for being alienated from their own parents. And again...it's how much you value it that you're back to discussing...the resentment is directly proportional to how important it is to you that your spouse do X. I'm not saying all expectations or resentments are wrong but I am saying we all have the primary responsibility of seeing that [b]our[/b] expectations or desires are met. As another PP noted: we have to reach agreement about what it is we value before you can expect equal commitment - this part/step is very very frequently ignored or omitted. Hopefully WRT children this conversation happens well in advance of having them (will they spend lots of time w/ grandparents, will they be introduced to religion, what kind of education should they receive, etc. etc.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics