Reply to Historical records of Jesus?

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Historical records of Jesus?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Matthew was an eyewitness
They are not exactly sure who mark or John were
Luke was a Doctor/scientist who double and triple checked the details.[/quote]
The gospels were stories told orally from one generation to the next. They were not written down for another 200 years after the death of Jesus. Do you think the accounts were still completely accurate by then?[/quote]

Not sure the basic story is probably accurate . Whether it was embellished or watered down is possible .  Scientifically , the shroud of Turin has a huge effect on me. The shroud is the most confounding and inexplicable artifact in the world and it just so happens to have the image of a man with crucifiction / scourging wounds and crown of thorns head damage.[/quote]

have scientists formed any opinions about the shroud - does it date to the correct time period, etc.? [/quote]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_14_dating_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics