Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Should I leave or agree to counseling first?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP here...to the PP. We went to see several counsels after we received the letter explaining the denial but all of them said because of the agency involved and the reason for denial, there is such a low likelihood for an appeal that they don't want to take the case. He doesn't actually work for that agency and they just handle that level of clearance for agency. He doesn't even need that clearance any more. We looked back at the SF86 he filled out for his current clearance and none of it would have triggered the questions the CIA asked therefore he was completely truthful in his current SF86. We are still waiting for the investigative file and what we hope to do is not actually appeal it such that he gets the high level clearance but to (I don't know if this the right words) remove the whole application so that it is not actually a denial. At least, they should clean up any language in the investigative file and letter to reflect the facts and not what the interviewer interpreted during my husband's delusional state (given his illness at the time).[/quote] Are you saying that the interviewer interpreted something in a way that your husband didn't mean it? Or are you saying that your husband said something which the investigator accurately interpreted, but that what your husband said was incorrect/delusional, because he was ill and therefore said something untrue? Or are you saying that your husband was so ill, that he let something slip that he wouldn't have let slip if he had not been ill? Or are you saying that your husband misinterpreted the investigator's question and thus responded in a way that let slip something he didn't really have to reveal? Of those 4 choices, only the first two are to your benefit and might get a change in info in the file (because you are challenging incorrect info). If the situation is one of the last two, it is accurate info and going to be hard to keep out of the file. It seems that your main concern is keeping the current security clearance so that DH can continue to work at his current income level, not whether the appeal of the new clearance will be successful. It is to your benefit to have counsel to help you prepare any filing or letter you send regarding what is in the file and the current clearance level. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics